↓ Skip to main content

Cuba’s bet on home-grown COVID vaccines is paying off

Overview of attention for news story in Nature
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
3739 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
8 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cuba’s bet on home-grown COVID vaccines is paying off
Published by
Nature, November 2021
DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-03470-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Reardon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,739 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2956. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,429
of 19,572,659 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#174
of 84,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61
of 277,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,572,659 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.