↓ Skip to main content

The Cenozoic palaeoenvironment of the Arctic Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
372 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
Title
The Cenozoic palaeoenvironment of the Arctic Ocean
Published in
Nature, June 2006
DOI 10.1038/nature04800
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Moran, Jan Backman, Henk Brinkhuis, Steven C. Clemens, Thomas Cronin, Gerald R. Dickens, Frédérique Eynaud, Jérôme Gattacceca, Martin Jakobsson, Richard W. Jordan, Michael Kaminski, John King, Nalan Koc, Alexey Krylov, Nahysa Martinez, Jens Matthiessen, David McInroy, Theodore C. Moore, Jonaotaro Onodera, Matthew O'Regan, Heiko Pälike, Brice Rea, Domenico Rio, Tatsuhiko Sakamoto, David C. Smith, Ruediger Stein, Kristen St John, Itsuki Suto, Noritoshi Suzuki, Kozo Takahashi, Mahito Watanabe, Masanobu Yamamoto, John Farrell, Martin Frank, Peter Kubik, Wilfried Jokat, Yngve Kristoffersen

Abstract

The history of the Arctic Ocean during the Cenozoic era (0-65 million years ago) is largely unknown from direct evidence. Here we present a Cenozoic palaeoceanographic record constructed from >400 m of sediment core from a recent drilling expedition to the Lomonosov ridge in the Arctic Ocean. Our record shows a palaeoenvironmental transition from a warm 'greenhouse' world, during the late Palaeocene and early Eocene epochs, to a colder 'icehouse' world influenced by sea ice and icebergs from the middle Eocene epoch to the present. For the most recent approximately 14 Myr, we find sedimentation rates of 1-2 cm per thousand years, in stark contrast to the substantially lower rates proposed in earlier studies; this record of the Neogene reveals cooling of the Arctic that was synchronous with the expansion of Greenland ice (approximately 3.2 Myr ago) and East Antarctic ice (approximately 14 Myr ago). We find evidence for the first occurrence of ice-rafted debris in the middle Eocene epoch (approximately 45 Myr ago), some 35 Myr earlier than previously thought; fresh surface waters were present at approximately 49 Myr ago, before the onset of ice-rafted debris. Also, the temperatures of surface waters during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum (approximately 55 Myr ago) appear to have been substantially warmer than previously estimated. The revised timing of the earliest Arctic cooling events coincides with those from Antarctica, supporting arguments for bipolar symmetry in climate change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
Germany 6 1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 458 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 125 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 22%
Student > Master 52 10%
Professor 44 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 39 8%
Other 91 18%
Unknown 38 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 297 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 15%
Environmental Science 43 9%
Physics and Astronomy 7 1%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 22 4%
Unknown 52 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#497,929
of 12,400,381 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,467
of 64,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#485,162
of 11,818,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#19,862
of 64,130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,400,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,818,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64,130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.