↓ Skip to main content

Poor Sleep quality and health-related quality of life impact in adolescents with and without chronic immunosuppressive conditions during COVID-19 quarantine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poor Sleep quality and health-related quality of life impact in adolescents with and without chronic immunosuppressive conditions during COVID-19 quarantine
Published in
Clinics, January 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto C. Helito, Livia Lindoso, Sofia M. Sieczkowska, Camilla Astley, Ligia B. Queiroz, Natalia Rose, Claudia Renata P. Santos, Thalis Bolzan, Rita María I.A. Peralta, Ruth R. Franco, Louise Cominato, Rosa Maria R. Pereira, Uenis Tannuri, Lucia Maria A. Campos, Benito Lourenço, Ricardo K. Toma, Karina Medeiros, Andréia Watanabe, Patricia Moreno Grangeiro, Sylvia C. Farhat, Caio B. Casella, Guilherme V. Polanczyk, Bruno Gualano, Clovis A. Silva, Adriana M.E. Sallum, Amanda Y. Iraha, Bianca P. Ihara, Bruna C. Mazzolani, Claudia A. Martinez, Claudia A.A. Strabelli, Claudia B. Fonseca, Dandara C.C. Lima, Debora N.D. Setoue, Deborah F.P. Roz, Fabiana I. Smaira, Hamilton Roschel, Helena T. Miyatani, Isabela G. Marques, Jane Oba, Juliana C.O. Ferreira, Juliana R. Simon, Katia Kozu, Ligia P. Saccani, Lorena V.M. Martiniano, Luana C.A. Miranda, Luiz E.V. Silva, Moisés F. Laurentino, Nadia E. Aikawa, Neusa K. Sakita, Nicolas Y. Tanigava, Paulo R.A. Pereira, Patrícia Palmeira, Simone S. Angelo, Sofia S.M. Lavorato, Tamires M. Bernardes, Tathiane C. Franco, Vivianne S.L. Viana, Vera P.M.F.R. Barros, Yingying Zheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,963,437
of 21,028,682 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#447
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,083
of 453,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,028,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.