↓ Skip to main content

Formulation of a Roman cosmetic

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formulation of a Roman cosmetic
Published in
Nature, November 2004
DOI 10.1038/432035a
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. P. Evershed, R. Berstan, F. Grew, M. S. Copley, A. J. H. Charmant, E. Barham, H. R. Mottram, G. Brown

Abstract

The discovery of a small tin canister in London during archaeological excavations of a Roman temple precinct, dated to the middle of the second century AD, is a landmark in the study of this class of artefact. Such discoveries from the Roman world are rare and this is the only one to be found so far with its lid and contents--a whitish medicinal or cosmetic cream--providing a unique opportunity for us to study the ancient formulation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Spain 1 3%
Egypt 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Unknown 34 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 13 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Chemistry 4 10%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#695,821
of 15,792,176 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25,258
of 75,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,532
of 262,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#490
of 958 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,792,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 958 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.