↓ Skip to main content

Identification of an AR Mutation-Negative Class of Androgen Insensitivity by Determining Endogenous AR Activity

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of an AR Mutation-Negative Class of Androgen Insensitivity by Determining Endogenous AR Activity
Published in
JCEM, September 2016
DOI 10.1210/jc.2016-1990
Pubmed ID
Authors

N C Hornig, M Ukat, H U Schweikert, O Hiort, R Werner, S L S Drop, M Cools, I A Hughes, L Audi, S F Ahmed, J Demiri, P Rodens, L Worch, G Wehner, A E Kulle, D Dunstheimer, E Müller-Roßberg, T Reinehr, A T Hadidi, A K Eckstein, C van der Horst, C Seif, R Siebert, O Ammerpohl, P-M Holterhus

Abstract

Only about 85% of patients with clinical diagnosis complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and less than 30% with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS) can be explained by inactivating mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene. To clarify this discrepancy by in-vitro determination of AR transcriptional activity in individuals with disorders of sex development (DSD) and male controls. Quantification of dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-dependent transcriptional induction of the AR target gene apolipoprotein D (APOD) in cultured genital fibroblasts (GF) (APOD-assay) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of the complete coding - and non-coding AR-locus. University Hospital Endocrine research laboratory Patients: GF from 169 individuals were studied encompassing control males (N=68), molecular defined DSD other than AIS (N=18), AR-mutation positive AIS (N=37) and previously undiagnosed DSD including patients with clinical suspicion of AIS (N=46). None. DHT-dependent APOD-expression in cultured GF and AR-mutation status in 169 individuals. The APOD-assay clearly separated control individuals (healthy males and molecular defined DSD patients other than AIS) from genetically proven AIS (cutoff <2.3-fold APOD-induction; 100% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, p<0.0001). Of 46 DSD-individuals with no AR-mutation, 17 (37%) fell below the cutoff indicating disrupted androgen signaling. AR-mutation positive AIS can be reliably identified by the APOD-assay. Its combination with NGS of the AR-locus uncovered an AR-mutation negative, new class of androgen resistance which we propose to name AIS type II. Our data support the existence of cellular components outside the AR affecting androgen signaling during sexual differentiation with high clinical relevance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,739,153
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#1,314
of 15,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,467
of 348,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#30
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.