You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemiology of Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciab989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gilbert T Chua, Mike Yat Wah Kwan, Celine S L Chui, Robert David Smith, Edmund Chi Lok Cheung, Tian Ma, Miriam T Y Leung, Sabrina Siu Ling Tsao, Elaine Kan, Wing Kei Carol Ng, Victor Chi Man Chan, Shuk Mui Tai, Tak Ching Yu, Kwok Piu Lee, Joshua Sung Chih Wong, Ying Kit Lin, Chi Chiu Shek, Agnes Sze Yin Leung, Chit Kwong Chow, Ka Wah Li, Johnny Ma, Wai Yuk Fung, Daniel Lee, Ming Yen Ng, Wilfred Hing Sang Wong, Hing Wai Tsang, Janette Kwok, Daniel Leung, Kin Lai Chung, Chun Bong Chow, Godfrey Chi Fung Chan, Wing Hang Leung, Kelvin Kai Wang To, Kwok Yung Yuen, Yu Lung Lau, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Patrick Ip |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 791 | 6% |
| France | 460 | 4% |
| Japan | 397 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 376 | 3% |
| Brazil | 366 | 3% |
| Italy | 273 | 2% |
| Canada | 236 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 193 | 2% |
| Germany | 133 | 1% |
| Other | 930 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8059 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11738 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 197 | 2% |
| Scientists | 174 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 77 | <1% |
| Unknown | 28 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#366
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#2
of 17,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 524,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.