You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CySBGN: A Cytoscape plug-in to integrate SBGN maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuel Gonçalves, Martijn van Iersel, Julio Saez-Rodriguez |
| Abstract |
A standard graphical notation is essential to facilitate exchange of network representations of biological processes. Towards this end, the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) has been proposed, and it is already supported by a number of tools. However, support for SBGN in Cytoscape, one of the most widely used platforms in biology to visualise and analyse networks, is limited, and in particular it is not possible to import SBGN diagrams. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2013.
All research outputs
#4,794,565
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,797
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,918
of 288,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#33
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.