↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow-up of women treated for breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow-up of women treated for breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009553.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Bhasker Amatya, Louisa Ng, Marina Demetrios, Nina Y Zhang, Lynne Turner-Stokes

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation aims to improve outcomes for women but the evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 21%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Psychology 20 10%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 38 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2013.
All research outputs
#3,607,852
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,074
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,820
of 252,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#313
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.