↓ Skip to main content

Deep transcriptome-sequencing and proteome analysis of the hydrothermal vent annelid Alvinella pompejana identifies the CvP-bias as a robust measure of eukaryotic thermostability

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep transcriptome-sequencing and proteome analysis of the hydrothermal vent annelid Alvinella pompejana identifies the CvP-bias as a robust measure of eukaryotic thermostability
Published in
Biology Direct, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Holder, Claire Basquin, Judith Ebert, Nadine Randel, Didier Jollivet, Elena Conti, Gáspár Jékely, Fulvia Bono

Abstract

Alvinella pompejana is an annelid worm that inhabits deep-sea hydrothermal vent sites in the Pacific Ocean. Living at a depth of approximately 2500 meters, these worms experience extreme environmental conditions, including high temperature and pressure as well as high levels of sulfide and heavy metals. A. pompejana is one of the most thermotolerant metazoans, making this animal a subject of great interest for studies of eukaryotic thermoadaptation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
India 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Chemistry 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,038,463
of 8,855,606 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#243
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,161
of 301,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,855,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.