You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of a board-game approach on current smokers: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-597x-8-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasser Khazaal, Anne Chatton, Roberto Prezzemolo, Fadi Zebouni, Yves Edel, Johan Jacquet, Ornella Ruggeri, Emilie Burnens, Grégoire Monney, Anne-Sylvie Protti, Jean-François Etter, Riaz Khan, Jacques Cornuz, Daniele Zullino |
| Abstract |
The main objective of our study was to assess the impact of a board game on smoking status and smoking-related variables in current smokers. To accomplish this objective, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the game group with a psychoeducation group and a waiting-list control group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,903,917
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#160
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,796
of 284,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.