↓ Skip to main content

Lung Lesion Burden found on Chest CT as a Prognostic Marker in Hospitalized Patients with High Clinical Suspicion of COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Brazilian experience

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung Lesion Burden found on Chest CT as a Prognostic Marker in Hospitalized Patients with High Clinical Suspicion of COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Brazilian experience
Published in
Clinics, January 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca, Antonildes Nascimento Assunção, Jose de Arimateia Batista Araujo-Filho, Lorena Carneiro Ferreira, Bruna Melo Coelho Loureiro, Daniel Giunchetti Strabelli, Lucas de Pádua Gomes de Farias, Rodrigo Caruso Chate, Giovanni Guido Cerri, Marcio Valente Yamada Sawamura, Cesar Higa Nomura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,626,617
of 21,028,682 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#344
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,157
of 450,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,028,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.