You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Care for Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.729149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arthur Kleinman, Hongtu Chen, Sue E. Levkoff, Ann Forsyth, David E. Bloom, Winnie Yip, Tarun Khanna, Conor J. Walsh, David Perry, Ellen W. Seely, Anne S. Kleinman, Yan Zhang, Yuan Wang, Jun Jing, Tianshu Pan, Ning An, Zhenggang Bai, Jiexiu Wang, Qing Liu, Fawwaz Habbal |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,141,940
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,431
of 9,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,698
of 496,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#218
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.