↓ Skip to main content

Combining landscape variables and species traits can improve the utility of climate change vulnerability assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Combining landscape variables and species traits can improve the utility of climate change vulnerability assessments
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.030
Authors

Christopher P. Nadeau, Angela K. Fuller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Master 8 12%
Unspecified 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 46%
Environmental Science 23 33%
Unspecified 7 10%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,881,373
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,820
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,525
of 262,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#63
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.