You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasma fatty acid patterns reflect dietary habits and metabolic health: A cross‐sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mnfr.201500711 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaifeng Li, Lorraine Brennan, Breige A. McNulty, Jack F. Bloomfield, Dan. J. Duff, Niamh F.C. Devlin, Michael J. Gibney, Albert Flynn, Janette Walton, Anne P. Nugent |
| Abstract |
Using pattern analysis, we investigated the relationship between plasma fatty acid patterns, dietary intake, and biomarkers of metabolic health using data from the Irish National Adult Nutrition Survey. Plasma fatty acid patterns were derived from 26 plasma fatty acids using k-means cluster analysis. Four clusters were identified, each with a distinct fatty acid profile. Cluster 1 included high proportions of linoleic acid (LA) and low proportions of stearic acid (SA); cluster 2 was higher in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and SA; the profile of cluster 3 was higher in very-long-chain saturated fatty acid (VLCSFA) and lower in α-linolenic acid (ALA) (cluster 3); while cluster 4 was higher in fatty acids related to de-novo lipogenesis and 20:3n-6 and lower in LA (cluster 4). In general, cluster 4 was associated with adverse metabolic profile and higher metabolic risk (P ༜ 0.033). Clusters 2 and 3 were associated with healthier and protective phenotypes (P ༜ 0.033). Distinct fatty acid patterns were identified which were related to demographics, dietary habits and metabolic profile. A pattern higher in VLCSFA and lower in ALA was associated with healthier metabolic outcome. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,912,797
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#1,595
of 2,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,167
of 304,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#52
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.