↓ Skip to main content

Development of a multi-electrode array for spinal cord epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord injury in adult rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
15 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a multi-electrode array for spinal cord epidural stimulation to facilitate stepping and standing after a complete spinal cord injury in adult rats
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parag Gad, Jaehoon Choe, Mandheerej Singh Nandra, Hui Zhong, Roland R Roy, Yu-Chong Tai, V Reggie Edgerton

Abstract

Stimulation of the spinal cord has been shown to have great potential for improving function after motor deficits caused by injury or pathological conditions. Using a wide range of animal models, many studies have shown that stimulation applied to the neural networks intrinsic to the spinal cord can result in a dramatic improvement of motor ability, even allowing an animal to step and stand after a complete spinal cord transection. Clinical use of this technology, however, has been slow to develop due to the invasive nature of the implantation procedures, the lack of versatility in conventional stimulation technology, and the difficulty of ascertaining specific sites of stimulation that would provide optimal amelioration of the motor deficits. Moreover, the development of tools available to control precise stimulation chronically via biocompatible electrodes has been limited. In this paper, we outline the development of this technology and its use in the spinal rat model, demonstrating the ability to identify and stimulate specific sites of the spinal cord to produce discrete motor behaviors in spinal rats using this array.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 179 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Lecturer 8 4%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 53 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Neuroscience 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Materials Science 8 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 46 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,470,221
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#52
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,387
of 283,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.