↓ Skip to main content

Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 14,744)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
823 Mendeley
Title
Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets
Published in
Current Biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E.M. Watson, Danielle F. Shanahan, Moreno Di Marco, James Allan, William F. Laurance, Eric W. Sanderson, Brendan Mackey, Oscar Venter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 625 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 823 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 796 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 19%
Researcher 155 19%
Student > Master 108 13%
Student > Bachelor 83 10%
Other 53 6%
Other 118 14%
Unknown 146 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 261 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 251 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 3%
Social Sciences 17 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 2%
Other 61 7%
Unknown 194 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,687
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#35
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 343,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#1
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.