You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards the biogeography of prokaryotic genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-04233-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Pedro Coelho, Renato Alves, Álvaro Rodríguez del Río, Pernille Neve Myers, Carlos P. Cantalapiedra, Joaquín Giner-Lamia, Thomas Sebastian Schmidt, Daniel R. Mende, Askarbek Orakov, Ivica Letunic, Falk Hildebrand, Thea Van Rossum, Sofia K. Forslund, Supriya Khedkar, Oleksandr M. Maistrenko, Shaojun Pan, Longhao Jia, Pamela Ferretti, Shinichi Sunagawa, Xing-Ming Zhao, Henrik Bjørn Nielsen, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Peer Bork |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 512 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 13% |
| Germany | 36 | 7% |
| Spain | 31 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 5% |
| France | 21 | 4% |
| Japan | 20 | 4% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 1% |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 84 | 16% |
| Unknown | 203 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 254 | 50% |
| Scientists | 247 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 282 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 73 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 98 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 335. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#95,677
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#6,704
of 96,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,760
of 515,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#168
of 903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.