You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Retrospective Naturalistic Study Comparing the Efficacy of Ketamine and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.784830 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgios Mikellides, Panayiota Michael, Lilia Psalta, Teresa Schuhmann, Alexander T. Sack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,317,989
of 24,995,611 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,945
of 12,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,555
of 517,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#100
of 702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.