↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Facilitators’ Questions and the Level of Reflection in Postsimulation Debriefing

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
The Relationship Between Facilitators’ Questions and the Level of Reflection in Postsimulation Debriefing
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e31827cbb5c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Peter Dieckmann, Hans Rystedt, Eldar Søreide, Febe Friberg

Abstract

Simulation-based education is a learner-active method that may enhance teamwork skills such as leadership and communication. The importance of postsimulation debriefing to promote reflection is well accepted, but many questions concerning whether and how faculty promote reflection remain largely unanswered in the research literature. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the depth of reflection expressed in questions by facilitators and responses from nursing students during postsimulation debriefings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 42 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 22%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Unspecified 10 9%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 13 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,832,838
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#77
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,531
of 240,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.