You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tobacco control in the Russian Federation- a policy analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karsten Lunze, Luigi Migliorini |
| Abstract |
The Russian Federation (Russia) has one of the highest smoking rates in the world. The purpose of this study is to analyze past and current trends of the tobacco epidemic in the Russian Federation, review current tobacco control policy responses, and identify areas of opportunity for policy priorities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,522,432
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,897
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,256
of 285,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#41
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.