↓ Skip to main content

鼻アレルギー診療ガイドライン―通年性鼻炎と花粉症―2016年版(改訂第8版)

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 205)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鼻アレルギー診療ガイドライン―通年性鼻炎と花粉症―2016年版(改訂第8版)
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, September 2016
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.65.982
Pubmed ID
Authors

黒野 祐一, Kurono, Yuichi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,687,471
of 12,419,722 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#8
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,070
of 262,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,419,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them