You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people’s everyday lives and clinical care: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasper E Palmier-Claus, Anne Rogers, John Ainsworth, Matt Machin, Christine Barrowclough, Louise Laverty, Emma Barkus, Shitij Kapur, Til Wykes, Shôn W Lewis |
| Abstract |
Over the past decade policy makers have emphasised the importance of healthcare technology in the management of long-term conditions. Mobile-phone based assessment may be one method of facilitating clinically- and cost-effective intervention, and increasing the autonomy and independence of service users. Recently, text-message and smartphone interfaces have been developed for the real-time assessment of symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia. Little is currently understood about patients' perceptions of these systems, and how they might be implemented into their everyday routine and clinical care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 370 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 17% |
| Researcher | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 19% |
| Unknown | 71 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 102 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,586,265
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#513
of 4,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,296
of 280,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#12
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.