You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasticity of Extrachromosomal and Intrachromosomal BRAF Amplifications in Overcoming Targeted Therapy Dosage ChallengesPlasticity of BRAF Amplifications upon Drug Challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0936 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Song, Jenna K. Minami, Arthur Huang, Siavash R. Dehkordi, Shirley H. Lomeli, Jens Luebeck, Mark H. Goodman, Gatien Moriceau, Oscar Krijgsman, Prashanthi Dharanipragada, Trevor Ridgley, William P. Crosson, Jesus Salazar, Eli Pazol, Gabriel Karin, Rachana Jayaraman, Nikolas G. Balanis, Salwan Alhani, Kyle Sheu, Johanna ten Hoeve, Amelia Palermo, Stephen E. Motika, T. Niroshi Senaratne, Kim H. Paraiso, Paul J. Hergenrother, P. Nagesh Rao, Asha S. Multani, Daniel S. Peeper, Vineet Bafna, Roger S. Lo, Thomas G. Graeber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 52% |
| Israel | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 31 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 30 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#433,765
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#223
of 4,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,213
of 516,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#9
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.