Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods
Published in
Nature Climate Change, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/nclimate3115
Authors

Bing Liu, Senthold Asseng, Christoph Müller, Frank Ewert, Joshua Elliott, David B. Lobell, Pierre Martre, Alex C. Ruane, Daniel Wallach, James W. Jones, Cynthia Rosenzweig, Pramod K. Aggarwal, Phillip D. Alderman, Jakarat Anothai, Bruno Basso, Christian Biernath, Davide Cammarano, Andy Challinor, Delphine Deryng, Giacomo De Sanctis, Jordi Doltra, Elias Fereres, Christian Folberth, Margarita Garcia-Vila, Sebastian Gayler, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Leslie A. Hunt, Roberto C. Izaurralde, Mohamed Jabloun, Curtis D. Jones, Kurt C. Kersebaum, Bruce A. Kimball, Ann-Kristin Koehler, Soora Naresh Kumar, Claas Nendel, Gary O’Leary, Jørgen E. Olesen, Michael J. Ottman, Taru Palosuo, P. V. Vara Prasad, Eckart Priesack, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Matthew Reynolds, Ehsan E. Rezaei, Reimund P. Rötter, Erwin Schmid, Mikhail A. Semenov, Iurii Shcherbak, Elke Stehfest, Claudio O. Stöckle, Pierre Stratonovitch, Thilo Streck, Iwan Supit, Fulu Tao, Peter Thorburn, Katharina Waha, Gerard W. Wall, Enli Wang, Jeff W. White, Joost Wolf, Zhigan Zhao, Yan Zhu, Garry J. O’Leary, Jeffrey W. White

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 111 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 31%
Researcher 28 24%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 36%
Environmental Science 41 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 14%
Unspecified 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 8 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#23,734
of 7,554,544 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#127
of 2,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,207
of 242,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,554,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.