↓ Skip to main content

Λ(1405) poles obtained from π0Σ0 photoproduction data

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Λ(1405) poles obtained from π0Σ0 photoproduction data
Published in
Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, May 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevc.87.055201
Authors

L. Roca, E. Oset

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,747,023
of 3,627,846 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#187,647
of 222,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,064
of 281,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#14,398
of 17,063 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,627,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17,063 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.