You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
InChI - the worldwide chemical structure identifier standard
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2946-5-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Heller, Alan McNaught, Stephen Stein, Dmitrii Tchekhovskoi, Igor Pletnev |
| Abstract |
Since its public introduction in 2005 the IUPAC InChI chemical structure identifier standard has become the international, worldwide standard for defined chemical structures. This article will describe the extensive use and dissemination of the InChI and InChIKey structure representations by and for the world-wide chemistry community, the chemical information community, and major publishers and disseminators of chemical and related scientific offerings in manuscripts and databases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 18% |
| Researcher | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 116 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 73 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 62 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 132 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,648,319
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#105
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,863
of 291,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.