↓ Skip to main content

Stop and Think About p-Value Statistics: Fisher, Neyman, and E. Pearson Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<i>Stop and Think About p-Value Statistics: Fisher, Neyman, and E. Pearson Revisited</i>
Published in
Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science, January 2021
DOI 10.4288/jafpos.30.0_43
Authors

Ryota MORIMOTO

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,688,604
of 21,422,252 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science
#12
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,022
of 461,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,422,252 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them