↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Ebola: the 2014 epidemic

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
591 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding Ebola: the 2014 epidemic
Published in
Globalization and Health, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12992-016-0194-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jolie Kaner, Sarah Schaack

Abstract

Near the end of 2013, an outbreak of Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV) began in Guinea, subsequently spreading to neighboring Liberia and Sierra Leone. As this epidemic grew, important public health questions emerged about how and why this outbreak was so different from previous episodes. This review provides a synthetic synopsis of the 2014-15 outbreak, with the aim of understanding its unprecedented spread. We present a summary of the history of previous epidemics, describe the structure and genetics of the ebolavirus, and review our current understanding of viral vectors and the latest treatment practices. We conclude with an analysis of the public health challenges epidemic responders faced and some of the lessons that could be applied to future outbreaks of Ebola or other viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 591 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 590 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 126 21%
Student > Master 113 19%
Researcher 50 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 8%
Student > Postgraduate 27 5%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 159 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 8%
Social Sciences 40 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 6%
Other 132 22%
Unknown 183 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#232,014
of 24,489,051 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#20
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,645
of 327,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.