↓ Skip to main content

D-Dimer tests for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic hospital outpatients with a clinical prediction rule

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
D-Dimer tests for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic hospital outpatients with a clinical prediction rule
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012356
Authors

Francesca M Chappell, Alina Andras, Karen Welch, Marcello Di Nisio, Lindsay Robertson, Marlene Stewart, Fay Crawford

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#9,293,756
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,508
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,860
of 260,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.