↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale localization of touching somas from 3D images using density-peak clustering

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale localization of touching somas from 3D images using density-peak clustering
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1252-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shenghua Cheng, Tingwei Quan, Xiaomao Liu, Shaoqun Zeng

Abstract

Soma localization is an important step in computational neuroscience to map neuronal circuits. However, locating somas from large-scale and complicated datasets is challenging. The challenges primarily originate from the dense distribution of somas, the diversity of soma sizes and the inhomogeneity of image contrast. We proposed a novel localization method based on density-peak clustering. In this method, we introduced two quantities (the local density ρ of each voxel and its minimum distance δ from voxels of higher density) to describe the soma imaging signal, and developed an automatic algorithm to identify the soma positions from the feature space (ρ, δ). Compared with other methods focused on high local density, our method allowed the soma center to be characterized by high local density and large minimum distance. The simulation results indicated that our method had a strong ability to locate the densely positioned somas and strong robustness of the key parameter for the localization. From the analysis of the experimental datasets, we demonstrated that our method was effective at locating somas from large-scale and complicated datasets, and was superior to current state-of-the-art methods for the localization of densely positioned somas. Our method effectively located somas from large-scale and complicated datasets. Furthermore, we demonstrated the strong robustness of the key parameter for the localization and its effectiveness at a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) level. Thus, the method provides an effective tool for the neuroscience community to quantify the spatial distribution of neurons and the morphologies of somas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,816,222
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,949
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,808
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#84
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.