You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome reannotation of the lizard Anolis carolinensis based on 14 adult and embryonic deep transcriptomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter L Eckalbar, Elizabeth D Hutchins, Glenn J Markov, April N Allen, Jason J Corneveaux, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Federica Di Palma, Jessica Alföldi, Matthew J Huentelman, Kenro Kusumi |
| Abstract |
The green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis, is a key species for both laboratory and field-based studies of evolutionary genetics, development, neurobiology, physiology, behavior, and ecology. As the first non-avian reptilian genome sequenced, A. carolinesis is also a prime reptilian model for comparison with other vertebrate genomes. The public databases of Ensembl and NCBI have provided a first generation gene annotation of the anole genome that relies primarily on sequence conservation with related species. A second generation annotation based on tissue-specific transcriptomes would provide a valuable resource for molecular studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 70% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,147,847
of 24,287,598 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#572
of 10,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,580
of 288,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#29
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.