↓ Skip to main content

Genome reannotation of the lizard Anolis carolinensis based on 14 adult and embryonic deep transcriptomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome reannotation of the lizard Anolis carolinensis based on 14 adult and embryonic deep transcriptomes
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter L Eckalbar, Elizabeth D Hutchins, Glenn J Markov, April N Allen, Jason J Corneveaux, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Federica Di Palma, Jessica Alföldi, Matthew J Huentelman, Kenro Kusumi

Abstract

The green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis, is a key species for both laboratory and field-based studies of evolutionary genetics, development, neurobiology, physiology, behavior, and ecology. As the first non-avian reptilian genome sequenced, A. carolinesis is also a prime reptilian model for comparison with other vertebrate genomes. The public databases of Ensembl and NCBI have provided a first generation gene annotation of the anole genome that relies primarily on sequence conservation with related species. A second generation annotation based on tissue-specific transcriptomes would provide a valuable resource for molecular studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Germany 3 3%
Australia 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 77 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Student > Master 15 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Computer Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#943,086
of 13,272,830 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#346
of 7,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,463
of 241,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#38
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,272,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.