↓ Skip to main content

Flexible‐Dose Fesoterodine in Elderly Adults with Overactive Bladder: Results of the Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study of Fesoterodine in an Aging Population Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flexible‐Dose Fesoterodine in Elderly Adults with Overactive Bladder: Results of the Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study of Fesoterodine in an Aging Population Trial
Published in
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, January 2013
DOI 10.1111/jgs.12088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Wagg, Vik Khullar, Daniela Marschall‐Kehrel, Martin C. Michel, Matthias Oelke, Amanda Darekar, Caty E. Bitoun, David Weinstein, Ian Osterloh

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly adults with overactive bladder (OAB).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,575,306
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#2,376
of 7,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,930
of 292,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.