↓ Skip to main content

Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jong Kyoung Kim, John C Marioni

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetically identical populations of cells grown in the same environmental condition show substantial variability in gene expression profiles. Although single-cell RNA-seq provides an opportunity to explore this phenomenon, statistical methods need to be developed to interpret the variability of gene expression counts. RESULTS: We develop a statistical framework for studying the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-seq data. By applying our model to a single-cell RNA-seq dataset generated by profiling mouse embryonic stem cells, we find that the inferred kinetic parameters are consistent with RNA polymerase II binding and chromatin modifications. Our results suggest that histone modifications affect transcriptional bursting by modulating both burst size and frequency. Furthermore, we show that our model can be used to identify genes with slow promoter kinetics, which are important for probabilistic differentiation of embryonic stem cells. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the proposed statistical model provides a flexible and efficient way to investigate the kinetics of transcription.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 371 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 27%
Researcher 100 25%
Student > Master 37 9%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 42 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 25%
Computer Science 23 6%
Mathematics 22 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 48 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,348,537
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,056
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,992
of 290,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.