↓ Skip to main content

Evolving in Common: Creating Mutually Supportive Relationships Between Libraries and the Digital Humanities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Library Administration, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 184)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evolving in Common: Creating Mutually Supportive Relationships Between Libraries and the Digital Humanities
Published in
Journal of Library Administration, January 2013
DOI 10.1080/01930826.2013.756699
Authors

Micah Vandegrift, Stewart Varner, Micah Vandegrift , Stewart Varner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 15%
Spain 2 3%
Portugal 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Greece 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 52 65%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 34 43%
Student > Master 15 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 30%
Social Sciences 24 30%
Arts and Humanities 22 28%
Unspecified 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#264,318
of 8,170,401 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Library Administration
#3
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,258
of 299,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Library Administration
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,170,401 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them