You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Racialised people in clinical guideline panels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02759-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nav Persaud, Muhamad Ally, Hannah Woods, Aine Workentin, Nancy N Baxter, Andrew Boozary, Quinn Grundy, Aisha Lofters, Kwame McKenzie, Andrew Pinto, Holger J Schünemann, Sharon Straus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 54 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 66 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 52% |
| Scientists | 43 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#342,207
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,505
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,346
of 519,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#72
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.