↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215
Authors

Mark Novak, Justin D. Yeakel, Andrew E. Noble, Daniel F. Doak, Mark Emmerson, James A. Estes, Ute Jacob, M. Timothy Tinker, J. Timothy Wootton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 212 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 26%
Researcher 38 18%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 41%
Environmental Science 47 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,782,020
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#632
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,521
of 322,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.