↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?
Published in
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215
Authors

Mark Novak, Justin D. Yeakel, Andrew E. Noble, Daniel F. Doak, Mark Emmerson, James A. Estes, Ute Jacob, M. Timothy Tinker, J. Timothy Wootton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 31%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 50%
Environmental Science 30 26%
Unspecified 11 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 8 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,915,564
of 13,256,560 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#160
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,872
of 222,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,256,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them