You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215 |
Authors |
Mark Novak, Justin D. Yeakel, Andrew E. Noble, Daniel F. Doak, Mark Emmerson, James A. Estes, Ute Jacob, M. Timothy Tinker, J. Timothy Wootton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 212 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 26% |
Researcher | 38 | 18% |
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 47 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,782,020
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#632
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,521
of 322,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.