You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水田域の圃場整備におけるカエル類の生息場の保全
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Civil Engineering, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3825/ece.20-00029 |
| Authors |
渡部 恵司, 中島 直久, 小出水 規行 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 14 | 25% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,118,562
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#4
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,084
of 442,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.