↓ Skip to main content

SUMO

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'SUMO'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 SUMO
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 SUMO
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Reconstitution of the Recombinant RanBP2 SUMO E3 Ligase Complex.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Production and Purification of Recombinant SUMOylated Proteins Using Engineered Bacteria.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Fluorescent In Vitro Assay to Investigate Paralog-Specific SUMO Conjugation.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 SUMO
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Real-Time Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for the Analysis of Interactions Between SUMO Traps and Mono- or PolySUMO Moieties.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 SUMO
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 SUMO
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Detection of Protein SUMOylation In Situ by Proximity Ligation Assays.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Situ SUMOylation and DeSUMOylation Assays: Fluorescent Methods to Visualize SUMOylation and DeSUMOylation in Permeabilized Cells.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 SUMO
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Label-Free Identification and Quantification of SUMO Target Proteins.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The Use of Multimeric Protein Scaffolds for Identifying Multi-SUMO Binding Proteins.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 SUMO
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 SUMO
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 SUMO
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 SUMO
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 SUMO
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Systematic Localization and Identification of SUMOylation Substrates in Knock-In Mice Expressing Affinity-Tagged SUMO1.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Erratum
Attention for Chapter 12: SUMO
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
SUMO
Chapter number 12
Book title
SUMO
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6358-4_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6356-0, 978-1-4939-6358-4
Authors

Pirone, Lucia, Xolalpa, Wendy, Mayor, Ugo, Barrio, Rosa, Sutherland, James D, Lucia Pirone, Wendy Xolalpa, Ugo Mayor, Rosa Barrio, James D. Sutherland

Editors

Manuel S. Rodriguez

Abstract

Posttranslational regulation of proteins by conjugation of ubiquitin- and ubiquitin-like molecules is a common theme in almost every known biological pathway. SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) is dynamically added and deleted from many cellular substrates to control activity, localization, and recruitment of other SUMO-recognizing protein complexes. The dynamic nature of this modification and its low abundance in resting cells make it challenging to study, with susceptibility to deSUMOylases further complicating its analysis. Here we describe bioSUMO, a general method to isolate and analyze SUMOylated proteins from cultured cells, using Drosophila as a highlighted example. The method also has been validated in transgenic flies, as well as human cells. SUMOylated substrates are labeled by in vivo biotinylation, which facilitates their subsequent purification using streptavidin-based affinity chromatography under stringent conditions and with very low background. The bioSUMO approach can be used to validate whether a specific protein is modified, or used to analyze an entire SUMO subproteome. If coupled to quantitative proteomics methods, it may reveal how the SUMO landscape changes with different stimuli, or in diverse cell or tissue types. This technique offers a complementary approach to study SUMO biology and we expect that the strategy can be extended to other ubiquitin-like proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Librarian 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Chemistry 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,199
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#873
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.