You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interpreting one oral health impact profile point
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel R Reissmann, Ira Sierwald, Guido Heydecke, Mike T John |
Abstract |
Interpretation of scores from oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments, such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is challenging. It was the aim of this study to determine how many oral impacts correspond to one point of the 49-item OHIP using a new approach which translates numeric problem counts into the traditionally used ordinal OHIP response categories. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 27% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,820
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,557
of 290,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#30
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.