↓ Skip to main content

Interpreting one oral health impact profile point

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interpreting one oral health impact profile point
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R Reissmann, Ira Sierwald, Guido Heydecke, Mike T John

Abstract

Interpretation of scores from oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments, such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is challenging. It was the aim of this study to determine how many oral impacts correspond to one point of the 49-item OHIP using a new approach which translates numeric problem counts into the traditionally used ordinal OHIP response categories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Mathematics 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,820
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,557
of 290,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#30
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.