↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004705.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphaël Bize, Bernard Burnand, Yolanda Mueller, Myriam Rège-Walther, Jean-Yves Camain, Jacques Cornuz

Abstract

A possible strategy for increasing smoking cessation rates could be to provide smokers who have contact with healthcare systems with feedback on the biomedical or potential future effects of smoking, e.g. measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), lung function, or genetic susceptibility to lung cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Psychology 21 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 14 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,196,285
of 14,546,884 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,415
of 11,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,753
of 243,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.