You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acceptance and use of complementary and alternative medicine among medical specialists: a 15-year systematic review and data synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01882-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phanupong Phutrakool, Krit Pongpirul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,409,008
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#412
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,310
of 511,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.