↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for adverse reactions from contrast agents for computed tomography

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for adverse reactions from contrast agents for computed tomography
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daiki Kobayashi, Osamu Takahashi, Takuya Ueda, Gautam A Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka, Tsuguya Fukui

Abstract

Symptoms of an adverse reaction to contrast agents for computed tomography are diverse ranging, and sometimes serious. The goal of this study is to create a scoring rule to predict adverse reactions to contrast agents used in computed tomography.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Other 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,277,896
of 10,502,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#541
of 1,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,285
of 307,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,502,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.