↓ Skip to main content

Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management
Published in
Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085532
Authors

David M. Lodge, Paul W. Simonin, Stanley W. Burgiel, Reuben P. Keller, Jonathan M. Bossenbroek, Christopher L. Jerde, Andrew M. Kramer, Edward S. Rutherford, Matthew A. Barnes, Marion E. Wittmann, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Jenny L. Apriesnig, Dmitry Beletsky, Roger M. Cooke, John M. Drake, Scott P. Egan, David C. Finnoff, Crysta A. Gantz, Erin K. Grey, Michael H. Hoff, Jennifer G. Howeth, Richard A. Jensen, Eric R. Larson, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Doran M. Mason, Felix A. Martinez, Tammy J. Newcomb, John D. Rothlisberger, Andrew J. Tucker, Travis W. Warziniack, Hongyan Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 33%
Environmental Science 57 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 63 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,306,148
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#108
of 346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,910
of 311,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.