↓ Skip to main content

Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management
Published in
Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085532
Authors

David M. Lodge, Paul W. Simonin, Stanley W. Burgiel, Reuben P. Keller, Jonathan M. Bossenbroek, Christopher L. Jerde, Andrew M. Kramer, Edward S. Rutherford, Matthew A. Barnes, Marion E. Wittmann, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Jenny L. Apriesnig, Dmitry Beletsky, Roger M. Cooke, John M. Drake, Scott P. Egan, David C. Finnoff, Crysta A. Gantz, Erin K. Grey, Michael H. Hoff, Jennifer G. Howeth, Richard A. Jensen, Eric R. Larson, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Doran M. Mason, Felix A. Martinez, Tammy J. Newcomb, John D. Rothlisberger, Andrew J. Tucker, Travis W. Warziniack, Hongyan Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Other 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 37%
Environmental Science 43 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 29 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#899,231
of 15,324,718 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#66
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,261
of 268,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,324,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.