↓ Skip to main content

Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management
Published in
Annual Review of Environment & Resources, November 2016
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085532
Authors

David M. Lodge, Paul W. Simonin, Stanley W. Burgiel, Reuben P. Keller, Jonathan M. Bossenbroek, Christopher L. Jerde, Andrew M. Kramer, Edward S. Rutherford, Matthew A. Barnes, Marion E. Wittmann, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Jenny L. Apriesnig, Dmitry Beletsky, Roger M. Cooke, John M. Drake, Scott P. Egan, David C. Finnoff, Crysta A. Gantz, Erin K. Grey, Michael H. Hoff, Jennifer G. Howeth, Richard A. Jensen, Eric R. Larson, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Doran M. Mason, Felix A. Martinez, Tammy J. Newcomb, John D. Rothlisberger, Andrew J. Tucker, Travis W. Warziniack, Hongyan Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 19%
Student > Master 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 35%
Environmental Science 54 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 46 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,056,151
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#79
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,212
of 278,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Environment & Resources
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.