↓ Skip to main content

Too much or never enough: a response to Treatment of opioid disorders in Canada: looking at the ‘other epidemic’

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Too much or never enough: a response to Treatment of opioid disorders in Canada: looking at the ‘other epidemic’
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13011-016-0076-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph K. Eibl, Kristen A. Morin-Taus, David C. Marsh

Abstract

Prescription opioid (PO) misuse is a major health concern across North America, and it is the primary cause of preventable death for the 18-35 year old demographic. Medication assisted therapy including methadone and buprenorphine, is the standard of care for patients with opioid-dependence. Moreover, both of these medications are recognized as essential medicines by World Health Organization. In Ontario Canada, the availability of medication assisted therapy has expanded substantially, with almost a ten-fold increase number of patients accessing methadone in Ontario in the past decade. In their manuscript, Fischer et. al. (2016), present a view that expansion of opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) has outpaced true patient need and alternate strategies should be considered as first-line treatments. Here, we present a countering perspective-that medication assisted therapy, along with other harm reduction strategies, should be widely available to all opioid-dependent people as first-line treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,359,064
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#110
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,797
of 326,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them