↓ Skip to main content

Inflammation in Depression and the Potential for Anti-Inflammatory Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neuropharmacology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
19 X users
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inflammation in Depression and the Potential for Anti-Inflammatory Treatment
Published in
Current Neuropharmacology, October 2016
DOI 10.2174/1570159x14666151208113700
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Köhler, Jesper Krogh, Ole Mors, Michael Eriksen Benros

Abstract

Accumulating evidence supports an association between depression and inflammatory processes, a connection that seems to be bidirectional. Clinical trials have indicated antidepressant treatment effects for anti-inflammatory agents, both as add-on treatment and as monotherapy. In particular, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cytokine-inhibitors have shown antidepressant treatment effects compared to placebo, but also statins, poly-unsaturated fatty acids, pioglitazone, minocycline, modafinil, and corticosteroids may yield antidepressant treatment effects. However, the complexity of the inflammatory cascade, limited clinical evidence, and the risk for side effects stress cautiousness before clinical application. Thus, despite proof-of-concept studies of anti-inflammatory treatment effects in depression, important challenges remain to be investigated. Within this paper, we review the association between inflammation and depression together with the current evidence on use of anti-inflammatory treatment in depression. Based on this, we address the questions and challenges that seem most important and relevant to future studies, such as timing, most effective treatment lengths and identification of subgroups of patients potentially responding better to different anti-inflammatory treatment regimens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 468 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 20%
Student > Master 60 13%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 138 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 19%
Neuroscience 60 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 7%
Psychology 25 5%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 164 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#468,522
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Current Neuropharmacology
#30
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,087
of 332,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neuropharmacology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.