↓ Skip to main content

Speedy speciation in a bacterial microcosm: new species can arise as frequently as adaptations within a species

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Speedy speciation in a bacterial microcosm: new species can arise as frequently as adaptations within a species
Published in
The ISME Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/ismej.2013.3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander F Koeppel, Joel O Wertheim, Laura Barone, Nicole Gentile, Danny Krizanc, Frederick M Cohan

Abstract

Microbiologists are challenged to explain the origins of enormous numbers of bacterial species worldwide. Contributing to this extreme diversity may be a simpler process of speciation in bacteria than in animals and plants, requiring neither sexual nor geographical isolation between nascent species. Here, we propose and test a novel hypothesis for the extreme diversity of bacterial species-that splitting of one population into multiple ecologically distinct populations (cladogenesis) may be as frequent as adaptive improvements within a single population's lineage (anagenesis). We employed a set of experimental microcosms to address the relative rates of adaptive cladogenesis and anagenesis among the descendants of a Bacillus subtilis clone, in the absence of competing species. Analysis of the evolutionary trajectories of genetic markers indicated that in at least 7 of 10 replicate microcosm communities, the original population founded one or more new, ecologically distinct populations (ecotypes) before a single anagenetic event occurred within the original population. We were able to support this inference by identifying putative ecotypes formed in these communities through differences in genetic marker association, colony morphology and microhabitat association; we then confirmed the ecological distinctness of these putative ecotypes in competition experiments. Adaptive mutations leading to new ecotypes appeared to be about as common as those improving fitness within an existing ecotype. These results suggest near parity of anagenesis and cladogenesis rates in natural populations that are depauperate of bacterial diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 177 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 25%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 12%
Environmental Science 19 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,575,607
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#781
of 3,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,377
of 291,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.