↓ Skip to main content

Direct economic burden of hepatitis B virus related diseases: evidence from Shandong, China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct economic burden of hepatitis B virus related diseases: evidence from Shandong, China
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Lu, Aiqiang Xu, Jian Wang, Li Zhang, Lizhi Song, Renpeng Li, Shunxiang Zhang, Guihua Zhuang, Mingshan Lu

Abstract

Although the expenses of liver cirrhosis are covered by a critical illness fund under the current health insurance program in China, the economic burden associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related diseases is not well addressed. In order to provide evidence to address the economic disease burden of HBV, we conducted a survey to investigate the direct economic burden of acute and chronic hepatitis B, cirrhosis and liver cancer caused by HBV-related disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#12,676,336
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,153
of 7,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,540
of 282,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#56
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.