↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care tests for diagnosis of current SARS-CoV-2 infections in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,452)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
68 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
220 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care tests for diagnosis of current SARS-CoV-2 infections in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111828
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi Fujita-Rohwerder, Lars Beckmann, Yvonne Zens, Arpana Verma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 26 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 658. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#33,388
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#12
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,241
of 519,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.