You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The multiple streams framework in a nondemocracy: The infeasibility of a national ban on live poultry sales in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Policy Studies Journal, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1111/psj.12456 |
Authors |
Annemieke van den Dool |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 25% |
Mexico | 2 | 8% |
India | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 46% |
Members of the public | 8 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 22% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,626,006
of 24,618,075 outputs
Outputs from Policy Studies Journal
#133
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,382
of 509,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Studies Journal
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.