You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.o102 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Doshi, Fiona Godlee, Kamran Abbasi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19,430 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1888 | 10% |
United States | 1583 | 8% |
Canada | 537 | 3% |
France | 357 | 2% |
Netherlands | 316 | 2% |
Germany | 260 | 1% |
Australia | 236 | 1% |
Spain | 184 | <1% |
Turkey | 156 | <1% |
Other | 1848 | 10% |
Unknown | 12065 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18441 | 95% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 450 | 2% |
Scientists | 336 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 187 | <1% |
Unknown | 16 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11871. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#122
of 24,526,614 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4
of 63,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 508,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,526,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.